Hi James! Yes, that's also one of the reasons I suggested them. I have found a couple of articles related to loading of javascript libraries in a portlet environment, so we'll need to add some extra javascript code somewhere. I'll start looking into it in more detail after the 2.1 release.
Nils-H On 9/4/07, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hils-H, > > Could we solve some of these issues with your proposal for the <s:html>, > <s:head>, etc.? It seems the first instance of using one of those tags would > set > a flag in the request or session that the Javascript had been loaded and we'd > not > output it again. We could also do something similar to what MyFaces Tomahawk > does > with their extensions filter. > > James > > > On Tue Sep 4 9:09 , 'Nils-Helge Garli' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: > > >Hi! > > > >> I also notice that the ajaxExample no longer appears in the subversion > >> repository. Are there other AJAX/portlet issues I should be aware of? > >> > > > >Ajax in a portlet, from a framework point of view, is not quite > >trivial. There are issues with namespacing of javascript functions, > >html ids and loading of javascript libraries when multiple portlets > >using the same framework is on the same page etc. Until these are > >adressed, the ajax examples have been removed. > > > >There's also a JIRA issue registered for this: > > > >https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1894 > > > >Nils-H > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
