I like the result annotations along with codebehind/zero config, but I'm looking forward to the Interceptor annotation to have a completely usable implementation, and will check out the patch.
As far as feedback, in my opinion it would be nice if I can use the same result type String in the annotations as they are in the XML files, as this would provide better consistency and I wouldn't need to remember all the Result class names (such as type=ServletActionRedirectResult.class). The classes probably provide additional compile time check for the annotation, but I would prefer the simplicity of the shorter result types. Alex Ted Husted-4 wrote: > > There's a patch, but I'm not using annotations myself, and some > feedback from a couple of other people who are using annotations would > be helpful. > > * https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1796 > > There is also suppose to be some work being done a ZC MailReader, > which should turn up some things. > > -T. > > On 3/28/07, doktora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Zero-config will be quite some fun if we had some more annotations. >> >> Are there any plans on adding Interceptor and onther annotations? >> >> All we have now is org.apache.struts2.config.Result. >> >> -- doktora > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zero-config-and-annotations-tf3481752.html#a9731736 Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]