On 12/18/06, Jon Wilmoth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm working on a custom S2 Interceptor and I'm not sure what the best way to interact 
with the session and/or other Interceptors for that matter is.  First the session.  I 
read http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/how-do-we-get-access-to-the-session.html and I 
tried applying the concept of using a SessionAware dependency injection on my custom 
interceptor (i.e. public class MyCustomInterceptor extends AbstractInterceptor implements 
SessionAware).  I added the "servlet-config" interceptor to my interceptor 
stack prior to my custom interceptor.  Unfortunately, the ServletConfigInterceptor class 
only injects dependencies on the action.  This seems me that the only *current* way for 
an interceptor to interact with the session is through 
ServletActionContext.getRequest().getSession();


Yep, ServletActionContext.getRequest().getSession() is currently the
best way to do this.

Along the same train-of-thought, I'm also working on another custom interceptor 
that uses the output of a previous custom interceptor to do it's work.  After 
coming to the realization above I thought I might be able to use the 
ActionInvocation to get ahold of the downstream interceptors and check to see 
if they implemented a dependency injection interface similar to SessionAware.  
Unfortunately, one can only access the action via the ActionInvocation.  Is the 
lack of access to other interceptors within an interceptor intentional?  Is it 
bad to try and spread the notion of dependency injection on actions to 
interceptors?

<interceptor-stack name="baseStack">
 ...
 <interceptor-ref name="createSession"/>
 <!-- populate SessionAware, XyzAware actions -->
    <interceptor-ref name="servlet-config"/>
    <!-- Custom interceptor to populate CurrentUserAware actions [and downstream 
interceptors?] -->
    <interceptor-ref name="currentUser"/>
    <!-- Custom interceptor to load currentUser's preferences...implements 
CurrentUserAware -->
    <interceptor-ref name="userPrefs"/>
    ...
</interceptor-stack>

Hmm...do we really need to add IoC to interceptors?  What benefit
would this provide over storing and retrieving objects from the
ActionContext?

Don

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to