I just notice this. I hope that Struts is not going to polute the air waves with these silly statements about how SOA relates to AJAX, etc. SOA is an architecture and is orthogonal to all these interests. Please, please, please do not start some crappy misinformation about a serious topic. SOA is about services at the business level and has nothing remotely to do with these conversations. Please, please, please, again, try to make sure that this sort of discussion is not encouraged: it is just too painful to read.
On 3/3/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/3/06, netsql <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/j-shale0228/?ca=dgr-lnxw07Shale > > or WW2? > Which does services better? "Services" as in the dynamic back end of an AJAX or SOA type request? You can use either .. WW2 lets you use the standard interceptor mechanism that you use for standard POST handling to decorate the handlers, while Shale Remoting lets you either bind directly to a processing method, or indirectly to a Commons Chain based pipeline. "Better" tends to be a more personal evaluation, based on what you like and/or are familiar with -- but both approaches can meet the functional needs. .V Craig
-- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~
