The required validator would need to be registered, as usual. But the
rest seems OK.

If it were me, I'd try deploying the "simplied" version as its own
application, and seeing if that works.

-Ted.

On 4/7/06, Eric Rank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ted,
>
> Thanks for responding. In my real code, I have the one-to-one
> relationship set up correctly. In my efforts to make my problem as
> simple as possible for this mailing list, I neglected to change
>
> <form name="dealerSearchForm">
>
> to read
>
> <form name="searchForm">
>
> Assuming that the above was fixed, is there any reason why the above
> validation example wouldn't work?
>
> Eric

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to