Yes, it matters.  It matters because good frameworks have values related to
commercial success.  They are easier to use, they are easier to test, they
allow you to provide services in faster and more reliable ways, etc.  The
framework matters a great deal.  I am sure that there are many architectures
out, there, for example, built on the middleware concept.  That does not
mean they are equal to SOA.  Presumably there will be new languages as well
that will eclipse the old ones.  That is progress.  The eclipse happens
because there is real value in the products and not just the idea that they
are "cutting edge".

<SNIP>
On 4/4/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> That may be true, but let me ask this question: so what?  Does Struts as
> it exists today serve a great many people very well?  Yes.  Does
> everyone need every single new feature available out there?  No.  You
> know, I've had my complaints as well, but ultimately, if the offering is
> doing the job for so many, how does how far behind the state of the art
> it is really matter?

</SNIP>


--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~

Reply via email to