Joe Moore wrote:
Dion Gillard wrote:
Jonathan,
do you have a list of things that are technically wrong with Struts 1.x?
Dion, there is a Struts/Webwork merger afoot whereby the Webwork
codebase is being donated to ASF to be the basis of the next version of
Struts, Struts Action Framework 2 or whatever.
The fact that the Webwork codebase is being used as the basis of the
next version of the framework by the Struts people rather than Struts
itself basically leads to the unavoidable conclusion that the Struts
developers themselves consider Webwork to be better technology.
Johnathon,
You didn't answer Dion's question. The question was "Do you have a list of
things that are technically wrong with Struts 1.x?"
You complain that people don't answer questions on this list and look what
you've just done.
What did I just do? I answered the man's question as well as I could. I
don't presume to know everything.
So do you have an answer?
Joe, if the Struts people are abandoning work on the Struts 1.x
codebase, what conclusion am I (or anyone else) to draw?
Ask the Struts people why they don't want to work further on the Struts
1.x codebase.
Given that basic fact, there's not much reason for me to draw up a list.
The Struts team is abandoning the Struts 1.x codebase to work on a new
codebase that is the work of an erstwhile competitor. The Struts 1.x
codebase is and will be increasingly obsolete technically.
I think there has been very poor communication between developers and
users here. You guys just seem to be clued out as to what is going on.
You should not use me as some kind of scapegoat to take out your
frustrations on. Take this stuff up with the Struts PMC, not with me.
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
