Its a valid point - I did vote for WebWork without much knowledge and anyone crticising my decision to do that probably has good grounds to do so. For the record the following was my response on the PMC list to the proposal to merge with WebWork.
---- quote ---- "I like this idea and prefer it to Clarity. IMO a true merger of projects is the only way we might successfully pool resources and stop competing. Clarity is a good concept, but I don't believe it would be possible to keep everyone on board and prevent communities splitting. I have no real knowledge of WebWork, but it has a good reputation and I dabbled around in the source code a week or so ago and liked what I saw. I also think if Spring are involved then things are going to go badly - that may be an unfair criticism, but its my gut feeling. I don't have the time or ability to be driving Struts forward with major contributions or re-writes of the existing framework, but I am happy carrying on with smaller contributions and support -so pooling resources this way is IMO a good thing. It would be good to get to know the people from these other projects a bit better - I went to Eddie O'Neil's presentation at BeaWorld recently, but the others I know nothing about. Are any of them going to ApacheCon?" ---- end quote ---- Niall ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dakota Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 11:59 PM I am confused (there's an opening for those that like them): did you not vote for WebWorks, Niall? If so, how could it be that this education is happening now? That's not a challenge so please don't take it as one, but a curious question as to what is going on. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
