Yeah, I can see in some cases it might be quite handy to be able to do
this. I'm not sure how you'd go about exposing such a feature, though.
You might want to start a discussion on the Commons list to see if
there's any interest in building this in somehow.
L.
Raghu Kanchustambham wrote:
I can not recall the exact instance where I felt something like that would
be cool... but when I was coding something, I did feel something like that
would be useful.
But let me cook up an example for you right now: Lets say I have a "Mode of
Payment" dropdown which would let me select "CreditCard" or "Cheque". And
next to it is the instrument identifier textbox. Now If I choose
"CreditCard" option I want the Creditcard validation to kick in. Otherwise I
want the cheque validation to kick in. As of today I can accomplish this
only through regular expressions (if I am looking at declaritive style of
validation with out writing my own validation rule classes).
Another example could be: Country dropdown...If I choose "India" I want the
date text box to accept date in the dd/mm/yy format. If "USA" is chosen, I
want date to be chosen in the "mm/dd/yy" format.
I think it should be useful to do some of these by leveraging on existing
validation rules rather than re-write them.
~raghu
On 12/6/05, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So you're proposing a way for a 'validwhen' rule to be able to invoke
other validation rules (or control which of the validations specified by
the 'depends' value is actually enforced)? I actually think that could
be quite useful in some cases, but probably not very many. Can you think
of any concrete examples of where you'd use something like that?
L.
Raghu Kanchustambham wrote:
That is correct .. but what would be more interesting and more useful is
to
say "this should be in a date format when that text box is filled" or
something of that sort. What I think validation f/w supports is
validwhen
"co-exists" with other validation rules... but they are kind of
independent.
I want to couple them .. "enforce this rule only when that control is in
some state" kind of scenario with out using the regular expressions.
Dont you think that brings in quite a bit of value and ease to using the
validaror f/w?
~raghu
On 12/6/05, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, you can use multiple validations, (including validwhen) together,
but if you do they all have to pass. So you can't, for example, use
validwhen to say a field can be empty if some other field isn't set,
but
must pass the 'date' validation otherwise. Not sure if that made sense
or not...
L.
Raghu Kanchustambham wrote:
Just wondering Laurie ... why cant I use other "validation rules"
along
with
validwhen? I dont see any fundamental reason why I need to resort to
regular
expressions when I use validwhen tag. For example, it would be great
if
I
could say .. validwhen (some test) .. use the date validation!
Is there something inherent in the way it is designed that this is not
possible?
Regards,
Raghu
On 12/6/05, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was going to say 'yes, you can do that,' but I don't think you can
express field length constraints with validwhen unfortunately :-(
L.
Deepa Khetan wrote:
Actually, i need to implement a if{} else{} condition in validation
framework..
if(field1=='usr1'){
<field
property="password"
depends="minlength,maxlength">
<var>
<var-name>minlength</var-name>
<var-value>8</var-value>
</var>
<var>
<var-name>maxlength</var-name>
<var-value>14</var-value>
</var>
</field>
}else{
<field
property="password"
depends="minlength,maxlength">
<var>
<var-name>minlength</var-name>
<var-value>6</var-value>
</var>
<var>
<var-name>maxlength</var-name>
<var-value>11</var-value>
</var>
</field>
}
Something of the above sort... Can i do that with the frmework or do
i
need
to write my own javascript??
Regards,
Deepa
On 12/5/05, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 12/4/05, Deepa Khetan <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
I need sme help with validator framework.. I have a LogonForm
which
is
being
mapped with 2 different JSPs. Both the JSPs have the password
field,
but the
validation for the field are diferent(The minlength and maxlength
for
both
the pages is different). On the basis of the value of some other
field(say,
field1) i need to validate the pasword field. How can i do this??
You can use one of the form bean types with 'Action' in the name,
such
as ValidatorActionForm.
http://struts.apache.org/struts-doc-1.2.7/api/org/apache/struts/validator/ValidatorActionForm.html
These are mapped by path instead of form bean name, so you can
have
a
different set of rules for each action mapping.
In validation.xml, you might have:
<form name="/register">
which matches up with (from struts-config.xml)
<action path="/register" ... >
HTH,
--
Wendy
The other thing you might want to look at is the 'validwhen' rule
[1],
if you want to base your validation criteria on the value of field1
rather than on the action mapping path.
L.
[1]
http://struts.apache.org/struts-doc-1.2.7/userGuide/dev_validator.html#validwhen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
