That's being taken care. I am looking for javascript validations.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kalra, Ashwani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 5:33 PM
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: Strategy for javascript validation with i18n


Hi all,
In my multilingual project, I want to use my own custom Javascript
validation instead of one provided by strusts 1.1 I have to do this
because its not working in many cases with weblogic workshop, specially
the indexed fields.

My main concern is How can I provide a simple java script API which
should take care 1. Getting the message from resource bundle 2.
Substituting the message parameters 3. Doing different validation  for
different countries for the same field. For eg dd/mm/yyyy for UK, but
mm/dd/yyyy for US

1 and 2 can be done with I18n tag, but 3rd  is looking to be difficult
as I want to use the common javascript method.

Any have similar experience, please share with me.

__________________
Thanks
Ashwani Kalra





This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential
and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the
person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient,
you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate,
distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all
copies of this message.

This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is 
the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom 
it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient,  you are not authorized 
to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate,  distribute, or use this message or 
any part thereof. If you receive this  message in error, please notify the 
sender immediately and delete all  copies of this message.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to