Michael Jouravlev wrote: > On 10/4/05, Leon Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Btw, struts is perfectly crawlable, since you have a different url for >>each page. This will not let you index a concrete page, but the whole >>site will be at list indexed. In opposite, a JSF site will return >>different content to the "same url", at least from crawlers point of >>view. This will throw your complete site out of the indexer, as the >>crawler would think that you are "cloacking". You might or might not >>like this crawler logic, but at least yahoo, google and msn are >>following it, and there are about 90% of the market (at least here, in >>germany) so you can't ignore them. > > > If I am not mistaken, one of Struts best practices is that JSP pages > are not to be accessed directly. Therefore, pages do not have visible > URL, actions do. And an action can display a different page at any > given moment. > Struts and jsf are very similar in this manner, and also the links do not have to be http posts, they are once inside a form, only that way a multi form system has been possible in a decent manner (hence also the reliance on javascript for doing that) You always can link to a jsf page directly, and often you do, if you link outside of an action.
But the basic mechanisms regarding the whole page flow system are very similar in jsf and struts, although I have to admit (please do not beat me for that ;-) ) the JSF syntax and handling with possible optional combined controller-model and binding patterns is easier to understand than the struts system for people being used to classical non html ui programming also it is more suitable for easy to handle stateful scope systems, like Seam proves. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
