Hmm yeah, I guess that would accomplish the same thing. Thanks, Erik
-----Original Message----- From: Larry Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sep 30, 2005 3:06 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List <user@struts.apache.org>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OT] CVS question No, but why not just get the branch in a seperate directory (i.e., export it) and copy it over the trunk, then commit it? Lazy is good. Larry On 9/30/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm having trouble with merging again. > > I am trying to merge changes from a branch into the trunk. Since there are a > million changes, I don't want to deal with manually resolving conflicts. I > just want to replace everything that's in my working copy of the trunk with > what's in the branch, and then I'll commit to bring the trunk up to date with > the branch. > > The problem is that I'm getting conflicts -- the overwrite doesn't seem to be > happening. > > I am running this command (from within my working copy of the trunk): > > cvs update -C -j <branch_name> > > For some reason, the "-C" option doesn't seem to have any effect, or else I'm > doing this wrong. It's odd because no conflicts are reported by CVS output, > yet, there the conflicts are, in the files. > > Anyone know what I'm doing wrong? > > Thanks, > Erik > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
