from:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/io/Serializable.html
"When traversing a graph, an object may be encountered that does not support
the Serializable interface. In this case the NotSerializableException will
be thrown and will identify the class of the non-serializable object."
ATTA
On 9/30/05, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure it is a stupid question... I guess this enters the realm of
> generic Java question, but I can't say I've ever thought about this
> before... what happens if you have a class that implements serializable,
> and you then extend that class and add a member that is NOT serializable?
> Does that get flagged at compile-time? No, it wouldn't seem to:
>
> public class test implements java.io.Serializable { }
>
> class Nonser { }
>
> class test1 extends test {
> private Nonser ns = new Nonser();
> }
>
> This compiled without error or warning. Unless I'm missing something,
> class Nonser is NOT serializable, so by extension test1 should not be,
> even though it is extending a class that is itself serializable.
>
> Like I said, this is one of those things I've never thought about before,
> so I wonder what basic thing I've got messed up in my brain? :)
>
> --
> Frank W. Zammetti
> Founder and Chief Software Architect
> Omnytex Technologies
> http://www.omnytex.com
> AIM: fzammetti
> Yahoo: fzammetti
> MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Fri, September 30, 2005 3:57 am, Murray Collingwood said:
> > That's a very good point..... I feel like I've asked a stupid question
> now
> > - duh!
> >
> > Thanks Starki
> >
> > On 30 Sep 2005 at 9:52, starki78 wrote:
> >
> >> I don't know if you have to use implements at all
> >> because
> >> the super-class does already implement it.
> >> What would you like to achieve?
> >>
> >> Regards Starki
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------- Initial Header -----------
> >>
> >> From : "Murray Collingwood" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> To : user@struts.apache.org
> >> Cc :
> >> Date : Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:27:19 +1000
> >> Subject : Serializable
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > Just a quick question.
> >> >
> >> > Does anybody follow any rule (personal or corporate) for when to use
> >> "implements
> >> > serializable" on a Struts form-bean?
> >> >
> >> > Kind regards
> >> > mc
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > FOCUS Computing
> >> > Mob: 0415 24 26 24
> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > http://www.focus-computing.com.au
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> >> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> >> > Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/115 - Release Date:
> >> 29/09/2005
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> >> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/115 - Release Date:
> >> 29/09/2005
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > FOCUS Computing
> > Mob: 0415 24 26 24
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.focus-computing.com.au
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/115 - Release Date:
> 29/09/2005
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
