On 8/10/05, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frank W. Zammetti wrote: > > > Probably a better idea to be more deterministic and do it with a > > listener though, for the reasons Craig expertly described. > > I agree. > > Thanks guys--I'll definitely make the switch! >
Besides being more deterministic in this scenario, one quickly gets hooked on the ability to get notified when *attributes* are changed in request/session/application scope, as well as lifecycle events -- without having to modify the classes of the attribute instances themselves. Listeners are cool. > Dave Craig --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
