On 7/22/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PS: If you like the concepts and approaches of Spring WebFlow, you > will also like Dialogs in Shale ... it's the same conceptual model.
I followed discussion on Spring forum about using SWF in JSF. I even put out some ideas (one of them is courtesy of David Geary, he advised me how to swap panels in JSF for a wizard using the "visible" (?) attribute). I do not really like the implementation of SWF. I believe (of course) that my Easy Wizard is better than SWF. Well, I should stray from words "better". Though my whole "solution" takes only three tiny classes and no XML. These two flow engines have slightly different applications, I never claimed that Easy Wizard is good to define a flow for a whole application. But it is definetely better for short wizards, which are served by one action. SWF does not support Back button and Refresh as nicely as Easy Wizard does. Have you seen my stuff? I sent you an email about it a while ago. I think it worth a look: https://easywizard.dev.java.net The latest source code (though not changed much since March) is in Struts Dialogs project: http://struts.sourceforge.net/strutsdialogs/wizardaction.html Michael. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
