Joe Germuska <Joe <at> Germuska.com> writes: > > At 12:14 PM -0700 7/14/05, Jay Burgess wrote: > >Yes. It's because the leading zero is saying the numbers are > >"octal", so 01-07 > >are valid octals, 08-09 are invalid octals, and 10-12 are valid octals. > > Jay's exactly right here. Your options: > > (1) hack the Javascript validation; commons-validator provides a > mechanism for specifying your own Javascript and falls back to > loading it from the commons-validator.jar (well, in recent versions; > in earlier versions, the javascript was in the config XML files and > hacking it will be pretty obvious.) I'm pretty sure the server-side > validation doesn't care about octals. > > (2) use a "mask" validator with a pattern like ^(0[1-9]|1[0-2])$ > > Joe
Yes, the server side works fine. As you said I think it doesn't care about the Octal. Indeed I thought about writing a custom validation method but I was wondering about that peculiar behaviour. I will try your suggestions also. siva --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
