I was waiting for another period where tons of commits were happening. That's when I'd sneak in this one and see if anybody notices. :)
Now before somebody thinks I was serious (about the sneaking in part) -- this actually is on my radar. I plan on digging up the arguments around it. Speaking for myself, I think it's very useful, especially for those implementing custom base action classes. Right now, though, I'm finishing up config inheritance. I've actually been thinking of stuff that'd be useful even without being added to the core, such as a 1.2 compatible page prep through custom ForwardConfig objects, and this ActionDispatcher, and the POJO wrapper you outlined for 1.3. I'm beginning to wonder if it'd be worth the effort of implementing them and hosting them somewhere. Maybe the Struts SF site (I keep getting mixed signals as to its status) or even just my own site. Hmm... something like what Niall has on his site. Maybe he'll want to host these. Think of them as Struts counterpart of MS' TweakUI, or Struts goodies. Some of them might just be a weekend itch for me (or someone else), but who knows, people could find them helpful, if not by using them, maybe by studying how they work. Hubert On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:13:31 -0600, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hubert Rabago wrote: > > > >That certainly is one practice. Personally I don't use that. I > >> >mostly use my own Action subclasses, or if I want dispatch > >> >functionality, I used to use MappingDispatchAction. Now I use the > > > >ActionDispatcher class in > >> >http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31270 . > > > > > > Did nobody explain to you what being a "committer" actually meant? ;-) > > Joe > > -- > Joe Germuska > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://blog.germuska.com > "Narrow minds are weapons made for mass destruction" -The Ex > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
