I think you missed the point here, Attila. At least my point was that Struts is NOT, thank God, a page-centric framework. .NET, of course, is, and so is JSF.
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 22:00:31 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I guess if you guys think Struts is a page centric framework, you > should check out what > ASP.NET has to offer with it's code behind/"Page Controller" model. > BTW: I've been using Struts and ASP.NET and I was wondering if any of you > knew a Struts like > framework in the .NET world. Any idea is appreciated! > > Thanks, > Attila Domokos > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2005 9:52 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: Correct Prepopulate Method > > I don't know what to say if you don't see the difference between a > page-centric view and a view that uses OOP principles. Page-centric > talks about the Actions as if they were serving the pages. The pages > are pages. The Actions are Actions. > > On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 11:43:39 -0800, Jesse Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oops, as I had said in the paragraph that got snipped out, I am still > > trying to figure out the best way to fit everything together and > > obviously I misunderstood your comment to Joel. > > > > I am very interested to learn more about how to approach struts > > application design in a less page centric manner. Could you point me to > > some resources that could help me understand the alternate approach that > > you recommend? > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
