Rick, I really appreciated that you have looked at my small idea. Please write or see the sample code. You must get something from it, if you like page oriented. OzStruts is totally different from other page oriented framework, because it runs on current Struts, meaning it's simple. I'm personally not a big fan for event driven approach with page level refresh mechanism. If I want it, I would see Echo, Flex, Lazslo, or something that is totally event driven.
Frank, I have to say somethig about OzStruts, beacuse you might mis-understand it. This is totally Struts, and no additional config at all, just a standard struts-config.xml only, and even no new element like you suggested. Rick also worried about the leaning effort, but in this sense, OzStruts is more natuaral approach for Struts developer. and I believe it's less effort than leaning tiles. You can just consolidate Actions and Forms into one Page class for each jsp file, that it! Rick, your analysis could be true, 90% is cleanly done by standard Struts. but we have to know that 10% of requirements not cover thestandard Struts could cause 90% of maintenance cost, too. Tak Frank W. Zammetti wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Glad your on board :) I am going to work on it tonight, with a little >luck I can get at least a first iteration done and post in Bugzilla >tomorrow. Then we'll see if it passes muster for real :) > >I know what you mean about keeping up with posts... I feel like I'm >constantly missing things :) > >-- >Frank W. Zammetti >Founder and Chief Software Architect >Omnytex Technologies >http://www.omnytex.com > >Rick Reumann wrote: >> Frank W. Zammetti wrote the following on 3/7/2005 4:07 PM: >> >>> No argument here! Hence the reason I didn't want to add a new config >>> file >>> at all... my solution centers on the idea of adding one new element to an >>> Action mapping, <actionSetup> (although, as I wrote that just now, I >>> think >>> <mappingSetup> maybe makes more sense... perhaps even making these >>> attributes of a <forward> makes more sense... eh, thinking out loud >>> now!). >>> I doubt very many people would find this onerous. >> >> >> This would be nice! If it were right in the same struts config file, I'd >> vote for this approach for sure. Nice suggestion. Sorry I missed your >> presentation of this. I can't keep up with all the posts on this list >> any more:) >> > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Tak Yoshida mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
