Does that mean that we only eliminate the lazy idiots from joining?
The fact that I got through shows a quality control issue right there!
;-)


On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:54:44 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They have made the Struts mailing lists hard to find on purpose,
> believe it or not.  The rationale is on the lists.
> 
> Jack
> 
> 
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:04:35 -0300, Diego Espada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello ? I'm totally surprised about the current state of the Struts web 
> > site...
> >
> > 1) I couldn't find the address to subscribe to this list. I just made
> > it up, imagining that it would be the same as the Tomcat list.
> > 2) The Mailing list archive functionality is at 20 % at best. You
> > can't search messages, browse them ordering by subject or other
> > criteria, or browse certain categories. Almost everything that you do
> > returns a stack trace.
> >
> > Is the struts web site being mantained ??
> > Thanks...
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> --
> "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
> ~Dakota Jack~
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


-- 
(The Lands' End guy is now using GMail to keep the clutter out of his
work inbox)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to