Does that mean that we only eliminate the lazy idiots from joining? The fact that I got through shows a quality control issue right there! ;-)
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:54:44 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > They have made the Struts mailing lists hard to find on purpose, > believe it or not. The rationale is on the lists. > > Jack > > > On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:04:35 -0300, Diego Espada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello ? I'm totally surprised about the current state of the Struts web > > site... > > > > 1) I couldn't find the address to subscribe to this list. I just made > > it up, imagining that it would be the same as the Tomcat list. > > 2) The Mailing list archive functionality is at 20 % at best. You > > can't search messages, browse them ordering by subject or other > > criteria, or browse certain categories. Almost everything that you do > > returns a stack trace. > > > > Is the struts web site being mantained ?? > > Thanks... > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." > ~Dakota Jack~ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- (The Lands' End guy is now using GMail to keep the clutter out of his work inbox) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]