|
Hy, yes it works, but only for one hierarchy Base Definition: <tiles-definitions> <definition name=".cpfDefinition"
path="/cpfLayout.jsp" > <put
name="de.unknown.cp.cpfextension"
value="/cpfdefault.jsp"/> </definition> </tiles-definitions> First hierarchy: <tiles-definitions> <definition
name="de.unknown.cp.topmenue" extends=".cpfDefinition"> <put name="de.unknown.cp.cpfextension"
value="de.unknown.cp.topmenue.component" type="definition"
/> </definition> <definition
name="de.unknown.cp.topmenue.component"
path="/plugins/topmenue/topmenueLayout.jsp" > <put
name="de.unknown.cp.topmenue.top" value="/plugins/topmenue/start.jsp"/> <put
name="de.unknown.cp.topmenue.bottom"
value="/plugins/topmenue/start.jsp"/> </definition> </tiles-definitions> Second hierarchy: <tiles-definitions> <definition
name="de.unknown.cp.startbildschirm" extends="de.unknown.cp.topmenue.component"> <put
name="de.unknown.cp.topmenue.bottom"
value="de.unknown.cp.startbildschirm.component"
type="definition" /> </definition> <definition
name="de.unknown.cp.startbildschirm.component"
path="/plugins/startbildschirm/startbildschirmLayout.jsp"> <put name="de.unknown.cp.startbildschirm.leftmenue"
value="/plugins/startbildschirm/menue.jsp"/> <put
name="de.unknown.cp.startbildschrim.content"
value="/plugins/startbildschirm/content.jsp"/> </definition> </tiles-definitions> So the definition “de.unknown.cp.topmenue”
extending “.cpfDefinition” but delegates to
“de.unknown.cp.topmenue.component”. “de.unknown.cp.startbildschirm” extends
“de.unknown.cp.topmenue.component” but doestn’t know
“.cpfDefinition” and my Base get lost. Here a model for better understanding: Cpf, topmenue and startbildschirm are different “independend”
Struts Modules. Any Idea? Thanks Fredy -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Hi What you are describing works - I have several apps where I do this
sort of thing Hermod -----Original Message----- From: Hauschel Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 10:12 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Tile in Tile -> possible? Hey, is it possible to extend a Definition and overload a tile by a new definition? What I want is: My Base Struts Module should have a simple baseDefinition: <tiles-definitions> <definition name=".cpfDefinition"
path="/cpfLayout.jsp" > <put name="de.sagIchNich.cp.cpfextension" value="/cpfdefault.jsp"/> </definition> </tiles-definitions> This base should be extended by another Module. <tiles-definitions> <definition name="de.sagIchNich.cp.topmenue" extends=".cpfDefinition"> <put name="de.sagIchNich.cp.cpfextension" value="de.sagIchNich.cp.topmenue.componen"/> </definition> <definition name="de.sagIchNich.cp.topmenue.component" path="/plugins/topmenue/topmenueLayout.jsp" > <put name="de.sagIchNich.cp.topmenue.top" value="/plugins/topmenue/start.jsp"/> <put name="de.sagIchNich.cp.topmenue.bottom" value="/plugins/topmenue/start.jsp"/> </definition> </tiles-definitions> But I think that is not possible. Is there another way to something like this? Maybe: <tiles-definitions> <definition name="de.sagIchNich.cp.topmenue" extends=".cpfDefinition"> <put name="de.sagIchNich.cp.cpfextension"
value="subLayout.jsp"/> <put name="sublayoutTile1"
value="first.jsp"/> <put name="sublayoutTile2"
value="second.jsp"/> </definition> </tiles-definitions> Thanks Fredy * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * This email with attachments is solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Please also be aware that the DnB NOR
Group cannot accept any payment orders or other legally binding
correspondence with customers as a part of an email. This email message has been virus checked by the virus programs used in the DnB NOR Group. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
