On 10 Mar 2005, at 13:48, NetSQL wrote:
Ex#2: you can create a cursor to give everyone in NYC a raise, and go by row by row. Or you can do a set operation in one command. I allways avoid row by row, and allways try to go for set, as per direction by Celko and others. Your millage may vary.

Okay, now I see what you are saying. Yes, a bulk UPDATE is certainly faster (and easier) than fetching a ResultSet and firing UPDATEs on each row. That's just a matter of using SQL properly.

But this isn't the situation I was talking about. There are times it is legitimately necessary to get a large ResultSet in one gulp and pass it on to the client. This is what I was talking about; I don't want to keep the whole thing in memory.

--
Scott Lamb <http://www.slamb.org/>

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



Reply via email to