I guess I focused on the "backward compatibility" issue, which I did not understand at all. Thanks.
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 19:09:45 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joe and Bill did respond. > > * http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40struts.apache.org/msg07346.html > > I don't think anyone is opposed to use Strategy more often. (Heaven > knows I use it often enough in my own work!) > > It's just that no one seems to have the volunteer hours available > right now to refactor what we already have. > > What we have is ugly and problematic, but I believe that it does work. > If we ship it, perhaps someone (like you) will step up and refactor it > for Strategy. > > -Ted. > > > On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 20:34:06 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I inquired why the Template Method pattern is being used with Commons > > Chain instead of Strategy, but never got an answer. Given that the > > choice seems so problematic, that surprised me. Is that (no response) > > because there is no answer, or because it is a closed shop of ideas in > > open source, or because there is no time to consider such a stupid > > idea, etc.? > > > > -- > > "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." > > ~Dakota Jack~ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
