On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:46:06 -0600, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip /> > I'm generally interested in workflow solutions, but haven't had time > to review the libraries nor the urgency to develop my own. With all > due respect to Don, when I asked one of my developers to use > struts-flow for a simple project, she came away with a > not-very-favorable impression. From her implementation of validation > (a big 200 line long javascript method), I can see why it wouldn't > seem so exciting, but I bet that someone with more javascript > experience could find some different ways to organize it. Still, I'd > be more excited if it could tap into Struts' own validation mechanism.
Heh, I don't blame her at all :) In my case, I do use commons Validator for validation and only use flow for page flow, so my script is a fraction of the size of code that used to be in Actions. I guess this goes back to documentation, and I really need to work on it to make things like validation more clear. BTW, Joe, if you don't mind, what were the other issues she had with it? I'd be very anxious to address them before the next release. Don > > Like any open source project, it needs people who are willing to > treat the code as their own and use it and improve it. You don't > have to be a committer to do that... > > Joe > > -- > Joe Germuska > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://blog.germuska.com > "Narrow minds are weapons made for mass destruction" -The Ex > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
