<snip> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:15:35 -0600, Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > See Frank's post on the web service. He expressed it more eloquently > than I did. </snip>
But, Frank and I are in agreement. If you are not talking about the Web, then you are saying that the solution is not a solution to an area where there is no problem anyway. We were not talking about Intranets. <snip> > Names, depending upon how the web server is configured, could matter a > great deal. Name-based virtual hosts, for example ... </snip> Actually, Eddie, if you follow the logic in this situation through thoroughly you will find that this sort of configuration is completely irrelevant to this issue. The problems regarding finding machines in this area are not reflexive. Jack -- ------------------------------ "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ "You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep." ~Native Proverb~ "Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows." ~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~ ----------------------------------------------- "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation." --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
