It already does.  It's the third option on http://struts.apache.org/mail.html 

H

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:53:19 -0500, Brantley Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ahhh...
> 
> Perhaps the link for the list archives on the struts project page should
> point to this URL!
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> B.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David G. Friedman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 3:52 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: Opinions on Struts Layout
> >
> > Try the search key "struts-layout" at his archive:
> >
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=struts-user
> >
> > I just performed that search and numerous results
> > show up for that "word".
> >
> > Regards,
> > David
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brantley Hobbs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 3:49 PM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List; Dakota Jack
> > Subject: RE: Opinions on Struts Layout
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the tip about the spelling.  I did some googling, but
> didn't
> > really see too much information about struts-layout as compared to
> some
> > of the other technologies, which is really what I'm after.
> >
> > Also, does anyone know of a way to search the lists?  Every time I use
> > the search page
> >
> (http://mail-archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ts.apache.org), I get "Text search not available for this list".
> >
> > Thanks,
> > B.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 3:44 PM
> > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > Subject: Re: Opinions on Struts Layout
> > >
> > > Look under struts-layout.  The results of googling for struts-layout
> > > are somewhat surprising and you might want to do that too.  Naming
> is
> > > so important.  Why Struts Layout went with struts-layout is a
> mystery
> > > to me.  Wrong side of the brain problem, I guess.
> > >
> > > Jack
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:41:50 -0800, Dakota Jack
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > If you look at the Struts dev an user lists, Brantley, you will
> find
> > > > quite a bit on this too.
> > > >
> > > > Jack
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:03:59 -0500, Brantley Hobbs
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi all!
> > > > >
> > > > > When our organization was making the decision between .NET and
> > J2EE,
> > > we
> > > > > were really struck by how powerful MS's idea of web forms were.
> > The
> > > > > ability to drag/drop web controls onto a page is very
> attractive,
> > > simply
> > > > > because our developers were hired to develop; not generate HTML
> > (as
> > > I'm
> > > > > sure most of you were).  What eventually did .NET in (at least
> for
> > us)
> > > > > was MS's abysmal security record, and the flexibility afforded
> by
> > J2EE
> > > > > (i.e., can be deployed on any platform that has a JVM for the
> most
> > > > > part).
> > > > >
> > > > > Struts was the first framework project we ran into after we took
> > the
> > > > > J2EE plunge.  We all really like Struts, but we have been
> looking
> > for
> > > > > more streamlined ways of developing the view.
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, I ran across Struts Layout
> > > > > (http://struts.application-servers.com/index.html).  Perhaps
> I've
> > been
> > > > > living under a rock for a while, but it was something that I'd
> > never
> > > > > heard of before, and it seems to offer exactly what we longed
> for
> > with
> > > > > MS's canned "web controls".
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anyone here have any familiarity with this project?  How
> does
> > it
> > > > > compare with JSF or even with some of the other presentation
> layer
> > > > > projects like Velocity, etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > One idea that I really like about struts layout is that it's
> tied
> > > > > directly back to struts, so it seems that it might be a more
> > elegant
> > > > > solution than mixing technologies.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any input?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Brantley Hobbs
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > "You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
> > > >
> > > > ~Native Proverb~
> > > >
> > > > "Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to
> be
> > > crows."
> > > >
> > > > ~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > "You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
> > >
> > > ~Native Proverb~
> > >
> > > "Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be
> > > crows."
> > >
> > > ~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~
> > >
> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to