Thanks for the response. In this case then, the dev/ folder is
presumably under vcs and the layout would be fairly WAR based?

Thx.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vic
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 6:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: WAR based project layout vs Sun J2SE blueprint layout
> 
> 
> I think most projects point "Tomcat" to the dev folder, and 
> then issue a 
> reload command. As soon as you change JSP or java and 
> "reload", you see it.
> 
> Read up on tomcat reload and then find out your container'saproach.
> 
> .V
> 
> Dahnke, Eric (Company IT) wrote:
> > Hello List Members,
> > 
> > Whether to layout a project within version control as a WAR based 
> > layout (images/ pages/ tiles/ WEB-INF/ WEB-INF/src) or as a 
> sun J2SE 
> > blueprint layout (build/ conf/ src/ lib/ webapp/ docs/ test/ etc.
> > http://java.sun.com/blueprints/code/projectconventions.html) is an 
> > issue that has long plagued me as a developer and more so 
> as a manager 
> > who oversees java developers as well as jsp/dhtml client side 
> > personnel.
> > 
> > I've only ever found one or two good threads on the 
> subject, and most 
> > (but not all) Java developers I've worked with have favored 
> the J2SE 
> > approach. The _HUGE_ downside of this approach is that for a client 
> > side jsp or html coder to work, they have to use at minimum Ant and 
> > often times have a full IDE installed, so they can WAR the 
> > application, deploy it, reload the app server, just to see 
> if changing 
> > some column size gives them the output they were hoping for.
> > 
> > Assume a standard web application, and the display tier 
> technologies 
> > are html / jsp / css (not xslt and xml - as that could be a 
> solution - 
> > but not for rich client side web functionality IMO)
> > 
> > 
> > Has anyone experienced a development process or project layout that 
> > can accommodate the J2SE best practices and keep client-side 
> > developers away from the drudgery of compile_jar_war_deploy_reload 
> > just to see a simple js, css, or html change? I can think 
> of a hybrid 
> > approach as well the idea of creating multiple vcs projects for the 
> > different team members, but neither of those ideas excite me.
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks, Eric
> > --------------------------------------------------------
> >  
> > NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender.  
> > Sender does not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use 
> is prohibited.
> >  
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
--------------------------------------------------------
 
NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender.  Sender does 
not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited. 
 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to