Argh, just realized my messages haven't been getting through to the list. Should be working now though
Anyway... First, I don't think this got to anyone... Ken I think is right (I say I *think* he's right because I don't really remember writing that comment!). Reading it back now I suspect I meant the more generic term type, rather than specifying the attribute to set in the config file. I'm OK with it either way frankly. Honestly, I haven't thought about that app in probably three weeks :) In that regard, no, I have no additions/changes/etc., but I have no problem if anyone else has something to add if it's going to be included with Struts. It's only right that it be checked out and elaborated on and/or fixed as appropriate if it's to serve as a real example. -- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com Dakota Jack said: > DOH! I bet you are right. I never thought of that reading. ;-) > While I am here, I might as well ask Frank if he has any improvements, > etc. he would like on this. Jack > > > On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:26:15 -0600, Ken Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Since this is an ActionMapping subclass, then 'className' is the >> attribute used to declare it in the struts config, not 'type'; 'type' >> refers to the Action class to use. >> >> As written there, of course, 'type' could be taken less literally to >> mean the class of the ActionMapping. > > > -- > > > "You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep." > > ~Native Proverb~ > > "Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be > crows." > > ~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~ >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
