Craig, I don't understand this. I do want to be in the middle of the herd on protocols and I do want to be heard.
I don't understand your point here, however. Are you seriously saying this is just "noise" to users? Anyway, out of a lot of deference to you and out of a bit of "fear" from the warning part of "fair warning" and a little gratitude for the fair part of "fair warning", I have added [OT] to this. I assume that this discussion has to be at least as important to users as other [OT] discussions? If you insist that even this is not acceptable, I will even drop this [OT] qualifier and move over to the developer list despite my judgment to the contrary and despite the fact that I think this stiffles legitimate discussion. Jack On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:19:23 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:45:31 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [snip] > > With all due respect, which is considerable, on this topic the user > > list seems far more appropriate than the developer list to me. Users > > have a significant investment in Struts remaining Struts. > > Fair warning -- violating the community culture about how open source > packages are developed; particularly here at Apache, is not going to > help you get your ideas listened to, no matter how good they are. > > Craig > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
