Probably to discourage subclasses from creating/maintaining their own instance of ActionServlet... But then it doesn't make any sense to do that anyway, although you'll never believe what some users end up coming up with.
I'd be very interested to hear the answer to this one. -Yves- On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 18:04:57 +0900, Shinobu Kawai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > You don't event need that. As I said - servlet is a protected instance > > variable of Action, so you can just use 'servlet' in code in your Action > > desdendants. > I wonder why it's not private? Not very encapsulated... > > Best regards, > -- Shinobu Kawai > > -- > Shinobu Kawai <[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- For me to poop on! http://www.formetopoopon.com http://www.nbc.com/nbc/Late_Night_with_Conan_O'Brien/video/triumph.shtml --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
