As from 2.3.15.2 action: prefix is disabled by default (this is how <s:submit action="..."/> is rendered), to enable it you must add the below constant to struts.properties or struts.xml:
### Disables support for action: prefix struts.mapper.action.prefix.enabled = false Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ 2014-01-28 Manuel López Blasi <lopezbl...@conicet.gov.ar>: > Hello, > hi to everyone, > i've been researching the last week all over the web in relation to the last > 3 or 4 versions of struts 2.3.x, > it is in my understanding that certain changes have been applied to the > framework regarding security issues as > mentioned in > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Version+Notes+2.3.16 > security fixes from version 2.3.15.1, 2.3.15.2 , 2.3.15.3 and 2.3.16 > > My organization is currently using struts version 2.1.8.1 , so far we've > been able to call methods from an action class from jsp, > executing directly the method specified in the submit tag of jsp, we're > using stuff like this: > > <s:submit cssClass="CformBoton" action="registrarNovedad_registrar" > value="Registrar"/> > <s:submit cssClass="CformBoton" action="registrarNovedad_volver" > value="Volver"/> > > where the action attribute specifies action="registrarNovedad_registrar" , > that would be to call the action "registrarNovedad" > and execute the method "registrar". Together with wildcard mappings, > everything works beautyfully as expected, in this case we use: > <action name="registrarNovedad_*" method="{1}" > class="ar.gov.conicet.apps.sigerh.presentation.administrador.CRegistrarNovedadAction"> > > Up to here everything is fine but now we're trying to migrate from version > 2.1.8.1 to 2.3.16 and suddenly this kind of stuff stopped working. > I've been trying to make it work, using as template the examples that come > bundled with the last package available, struts 2.3.16, the proyect > "struts2-blank", > wich is about the smallest proyect one can concieve i think, so there're no > doubts or mistakes of configuration or anything is else. > > For what i've been able to see the syntax for s:submit tag has changed? It > doesn't react anymore to action="registrarNovedad_registrar" > so that this doesn't work anymore: <s:submit cssClass="CformBoton" > action="registrarNovedad_registrar" value="Registrar"/> > instead i've been able to make it work with <s:submit > name="method:registrar" value="Registrar"/> and proper configuration in > struts.xml > <constant name="struts.enable.DynamicMethodInvocation" value="true" />. It > doesn't work with DynamicMethodInvocation set to false, it just doesn't fire > up the method. > > I tried every possible combination of configurations, actionPRoxy > interceptors, ActionMappers , retried with other combinations, changed > acceptedParams and excludeParams in ParametersInterceptor > and nothing seems to work. > > I'm a bit confused about Dynamic Method Invocation and Wildcards as i > believe, since the documentation i have read, that those are 2 differente > concepts/technologies. > In our proyect we have > <constant name="struts.enable.DynamicMethodInvocation" value="false" /> > in struts.xml and this works perfect: > <s:submit cssClass="CformBoton" action="registrarNovedad_registrar" > value="Registrar"/> > by perfect i mean that if you click the button it will take you to the > action and method specified en the action attribute. > No luck on latest versions. > > > So here's my question: > Did the syntax of submit tag changed or has it been deprecated? > (name="method:myMethod" VS. action="MyAction_MyMethod") > > is there some way i can make my project work with DynamicMethodInvocation > set to false (turned off) using the same old syntax of submit tags and so > that i can call a method directly from jsp? > > Judging by the looks of what i've been researching all these are changes > related to security issues regarding Dynamic Method Invocation, i'm about to > drop the update and keep with the old version > as the impact of not being able to call method from jsp would be so huge in > the proyect and would require a mayor rewrite of it, it's litterally > impossible right now, u maybe somebody already got stuck > with this very same issues and have clues or solutions to this. > > Thank you very much for your time, > greetings to struts2 team for the great work and efforts. > > I hope somebody knows about this. > > Thanks a lot. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org