Not an array of prepares, but an array of strings for which "execute" methods the Preaparable callback should be excluded. On Aug 7, 2013 11:09 PM, "Sreekanth S. Nair" < sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote:
> With all gratitude, I strongly disagree with that idea . That bring more > clumsiness to big strust2 applications. And the idea of taking an array of > Prepare is a good idea but don't you think it consumes a pinch of runtime > performance. >
