Oh, can't you just set the parameter then?
Dave
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Eric Lentz <eric.le...@sherwin.com> wrote:
>>> Do we call this a bug?
>>
>>Probably, but I don't if it's an S2 or OGNL issue.
>>
>>Dave
>
> com.opensymphony.xwork2.interceptor.ParametersInterceptor
>
> private String acceptedParamNames = "[a-zA-Z0-9\\.\\]\\[\\(\\)_'\\s]+";
> private Pattern acceptedPattern = Pattern.compile(acceptedParamNames);
> ...
>
> protected boolean acceptableName(String name) {
> if (isAccepted(name) && !isExcluded(name)) {
> return true;
> }
> return false;
> }
> protected boolean isAccepted(String paramName) {
> if (!this.acceptParams.isEmpty()) {
> for (Pattern pattern : acceptParams) {
> Matcher matcher = pattern.matcher(paramName);
> if (matcher.matches()) {
> return true;
> }
> }
> return false;
> } else
> return acceptedPattern.matcher(paramName).matches();
> }
>
> Using the sample app. the debugger lands on "return false" in
> acceptableName and never makes it to isExcluded, so isAccepted appears to
> be where it gets stopped (returns false). That must be on account of what
> is considered "acceptedParamNames".
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
