Hello Jeroen,

On Monday 17 May 2004 10:42, Kransen, J. wrote:
> Anyone tell me if I'm wrong, but I doubt if UTF-8 covers Chinese. As I see
> it, it only contains 8 bits per character, instead of ASCII's 7 bits, and
> for that reason I assume it only covers 2* the number of chars. Maybe you
> can try UTF-16 instead?

You are wrong.

By default UTF-8 uses 1 byte per character. It uses a special character to 
indicates that the next character is 'high' and stored in 2 bytes. This makes 
a total of 3 bytes for a 'high' character.

So UTF-8 is a good choice for western languages with normally only a few 
'high' characters in the document.

> Jeroen

Regards,
Cees.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to