When contributing to an ASF project, it's governed by the terms of the ASF ICLA: https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf or CCLA: https://www.apache.org/licenses/cla-corporate.pdf
I don't believe ASF projects ever retain an original author copyright statement, but rather source files have a statement like: ... * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. ... While it's conceivable that such a statement could live in a NOTICE file, I don't believe that's been done for any of the thousands of other contributors. That's really more for noting the license of non-Apache-licensed code. Code directly contributed to the project is assumed to have been licensed per above already. It might be wise to review the CCLA with Twilio and consider establishing that to govern contributions. On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 6:10 PM Pavan Kotikalapudi <pkotikalap...@twilio.com.invalid> wrote: > Hi Spark Dev, > > My name is Pavan Kotikalapudi, I work at Twilio. > > I am looking to contribute to this spark issue > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24815. > > There is a clause from the company's OSS saying > > - The proposed contribution is about 100 lines of code modification in the > Spark project, involving two files - this is considered a large > contribution. An appropriate Twilio copyright notice needs to be added for > the portion of code that is newly added. > > Please let me know if that is acceptable? > > Thank you, > > Pavan > >
