Hello Users,
I am facing an issue in spark job where I am doing row number() without
partition by clause because I need to add sequential increasing IDs.
But to avoid the large spill I am not doing row number() over the complete
data frame.
Instead I am applying monotically_increasing id on actual data set ,
then create a new data frame from original data frame which will have just
monotically_increasing id.
So DF1 = All columns + monotically_increasing_id
DF2 = Monotically_increasingID
Now I am applying row number() on DF2 since this is a smaller dataframe.
DF3 = Monotically_increasingID + Row_Number_ID
Df.join(broadcast(DF3))
This will give me sequential increment id in the original Dataframe.
But below is the stack trace.
py4j.protocol.Py4JJavaError: An error occurred while calling o180.parquet.
: org.apache.spark.SparkException: Job aborted.
at
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.FileFormatWriter$.write(FileFormatWriter.scala:198)
at
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.InsertIntoHadoopFsRelationCommand.run(InsertIntoHadoopFsRelationCommand.scala:159)
at
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.DataWritingCommandExec.sideEffectResult$lzycompute(commands.scala:104)
at
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.DataWritingCommandExec.sideEffectResult(commands.scala:102)
at
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.command.DataWritingCommandExec.doExecute(commands.scala:122)
at
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$execute$1.apply(SparkPlan.scala:131)
at
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$execute$1.apply(SparkPlan.scala:127)
at
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan$$anonfun$executeQuery$1.apply(SparkPlan.scala:155)
at
org.apache.spark.rdd.RDDOperationScope$.withScope(RDDOperationScope.scala:151)
at
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.executeQuery(SparkPlan.scala:152)
at
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SparkPlan.execute(SparkPlan.scala:127)
at
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.toRdd$lzycompute(QueryExecution.scala:80)
at
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.toRdd(QueryExecution.scala:80)
at
org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameWriter$$anonfun$runCommand$1.apply(DataFrameWriter.scala:676)
at
org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameWriter$$anonfun$runCommand$1.apply(DataFrameWriter.scala:676)
at
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$$anonfun$withNewExecutionId$1.apply(SQLExecution.scala:78)
at
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$.withSQLConfPropagated(SQLExecution.scala:125)
at
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$.withNewExecutionId(SQLExecution.scala:73)
at
org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameWriter.runCommand(DataFrameWriter.scala:676)
at
org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameWriter.saveToV1Source(DataFrameWriter.scala:285)
at
org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameWriter.save(DataFrameWriter.scala:271)
at
org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameWriter.save(DataFrameWriter.scala:229)
at
org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameWriter.parquet(DataFrameWriter.scala:566)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at py4j.reflection.MethodInvoker.invoke(MethodInvoker.java:244)
at
py4j.reflection.ReflectionEngine.invoke(ReflectionEngine.java:357)
at py4j.Gateway.invoke(Gateway.java:282)
at
py4j.commands.AbstractCommand.invokeMethod(AbstractCommand.java:132)
at py4j.commands.CallCommand.execute(CallCommand.java:79)
at py4j.GatewayConnection.run(GatewayConnection.java:238)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
Caused by: org.apache.spark.SparkException: Could not execute broadcast in
1000 secs. You can increase the timeout for broadcasts via
spark.sql.broadcastTimeout or disable broadcast join by setting
spark.sql.autoBroadcastJoinThreshold to -1
Initially this threshold was 300. I already increased it.
Kind Regards,
Sachit Murarka
