I've seen a number of visuals showing the processing time benefits of using
Datasets+DataFrames over RDDs, but I'd assume that there are performance
benefits to using a defined case class instead a generic Dataset[Row].  The
tale of three Spark APIs post mentions "If you want higher degree of
type-safety at compile time, want typed JVM objects, *take advantage of
Catalyst optimization, and benefit from Tungsten’s efficient code
generation, use Dataset.*"

Are there any comparisons showing the performance differences between
Datasets and DataFrames?  Or more information about how Catalyst/Tungsten
handle them differently?



--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Is-there-a-processing-speed-difference-between-DataFrames-and-Datasets-tp28117.html
Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe e-mail: user-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to