We will look into streaming-streaming joins in future release of Spark,
though no promises on any timeline yet. We are currently fighting to get
Spark 2.0 out of the door.
There isnt a JIRA for this right now. However, you can track the Structured
Streaming Epic JIRA to track whats going on. I try to post major feature
stuff as sub jiras of this master jira.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8360

On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:19 PM, craigjar <craig.jarc...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have been doing several Spark PoC projects recently and the latest one
> involved the new 2.0 experimental feature Structured Streaming.  My PoC
> ended up being a non-starter as I quickly realized the stream to stream
> joins are not implemented yet.  I believe this feature will be immensely
> powerful and allow applications to migrate from batch to streaming with
> ease, which is exactly what I would like to accomplish.
>
> I came across an interesting article (link below) from another streaming
> platform called AMPS which I believe describes a common use case where
> Spark's Structured Streaming would be perfect for and I hope the Spark dev
> team is looking at the AMPS platform for some inspiration.
>
>
> http://www.crankuptheamps.com/blog/posts/2014/04/07/real-time-streaming-joins-reinvented/
>
> I am posting this for two reason:
>  - Share AMPS approach to this problem and get the communities thoughts on
> Spark's Structured Streaming approach if it will provide similar semantics
>  - Inquire about the availability of stream to stream joins and where I can
> follow along (is there a JIRA or dev mailing list topic I can follow).
>
> Thank you in advance for any replies.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Structured-Streaming-Comparison-to-AMPS-tp27303.html
> Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe e-mail: user-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to