ok they are submitted but the latter one 14302 is it doing anything?

can you check it with jmonitor or the logs created

HTH



Dr Mich Talebzadeh



LinkedIn * 
https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=AAEAAAAWh2gBxianrbJd6zP6AcPCCdOABUrV8Pw
<https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=AAEAAAAWh2gBxianrbJd6zP6AcPCCdOABUrV8Pw>*



http://talebzadehmich.wordpress.com



On 28 May 2016 at 18:03, sujeet jog <sujeet....@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Ted,
>
> Thanks Mich,  yes i see that i can run two applications by submitting
> these,  probably Driver + Executor running in a single JVM .  In-Process
> Spark.
>
> wondering if this can be used in production systems,  the reason for me
> considering local instead of standalone cluster mode is purely because of
> CPU/MEM resources,  i.e,  i currently do not have the liberty to use 1
> Driver & 1 Executor per application,    ( running in a embedded network
> switch  )
>
>
> jps output
> [root@fos-elastic02 ~]# jps
> 14258 SparkSubmit
> 14503 Jps
> 14302 SparkSubmit
> ,
>
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Mich Talebzadeh <
> mich.talebza...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ok so you want to run all this in local mode. In other words something
>> like below
>>
>> ${SPARK_HOME}/bin/spark-submit \
>>
>>                 --master local[2] \
>>
>>                 --driver-memory 2G \
>>
>>                 --num-executors=1 \
>>
>>                 --executor-memory=2G \
>>
>>                 --executor-cores=2 \
>>
>>
>> I am not sure it will work for multiple drivers (app/JVM).  The only way
>> you can find out is to do try it running two apps simultaneously. You have
>> a number of tools.
>>
>>
>>
>>    1. use jps to see the apps and PID
>>    2. use jmonitor to see memory/cpu/heap usage for each spark-submit job
>>
>> HTH
>>
>> Dr Mich Talebzadeh
>>
>>
>>
>> LinkedIn * 
>> https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=AAEAAAAWh2gBxianrbJd6zP6AcPCCdOABUrV8Pw
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=AAEAAAAWh2gBxianrbJd6zP6AcPCCdOABUrV8Pw>*
>>
>>
>>
>> http://talebzadehmich.wordpress.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On 28 May 2016 at 17:41, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sujeet:
>>>
>>> Please also see:
>>>
>>> https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/spark-standalone.html
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Mich Talebzadeh <
>>> mich.talebza...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Sujeet,
>>>>
>>>> if you have a single machine then it is Spark standalone mode.
>>>>
>>>> In Standalone cluster mode Spark allocates resources based on cores.
>>>> By default, an application will grab all the cores in the cluster.
>>>>
>>>> You only have one worker that lives within the driver JVM process that
>>>> you start when you start the application with spark-shell or spark-submit
>>>> in the host where the cluster manager is running.
>>>>
>>>> The Driver node runs on the same host that the cluster manager is
>>>> running. The Driver requests the Cluster Manager for resources to run
>>>> tasks. The worker is tasked to create the executor (in this case there is
>>>> only one executor) for the Driver. The Executor runs tasks for the Driver.
>>>> Only one executor can be allocated on each worker per application. In your
>>>> case you only have
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The minimum you will need will be 2-4G of RAM and two cores. Well that
>>>> is my experience. Yes you can submit more than one spark-submit (the
>>>> driver) but they may queue up behind the running one if there is not enough
>>>> resources.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You pointed out that you will be running few applications in parallel
>>>> on the same host. The likelihood is that you are using a VM machine for
>>>> this purpose and the best option is to try running the first one, Check Web
>>>> GUI on  4040 to see the progress of this Job. If you start the next JVM
>>>> then assuming it is working, it will be using port 4041 and so forth.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In actual fact try the command "free" to see how much free memory you
>>>> have.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> HTH
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dr Mich Talebzadeh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> LinkedIn * 
>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=AAEAAAAWh2gBxianrbJd6zP6AcPCCdOABUrV8Pw
>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=AAEAAAAWh2gBxianrbJd6zP6AcPCCdOABUrV8Pw>*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://talebzadehmich.wordpress.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 28 May 2016 at 16:42, sujeet jog <sujeet....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a question w.r.t  production deployment mode of spark,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have 3 applications which i would like to run independently on a
>>>>> single machine, i need to run the drivers in the same machine.
>>>>>
>>>>> The amount of resources i have is also limited, like 4- 5GB RAM , 3 -
>>>>> 4 cores.
>>>>>
>>>>> For deployment in standalone mode : i believe i need
>>>>>
>>>>> 1 Driver JVM,  1 worker node ( 1 executor )
>>>>> 1 Driver JVM,  1 worker node ( 1 executor )
>>>>> 1 Driver JVM,  1 worker node ( 1 executor )
>>>>>
>>>>> The issue here is i will require 6 JVM running in parallel, for which
>>>>> i do not have sufficient CPU/MEM resources,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hence i was looking more towards a local mode deployment mode, would
>>>>> like to know if anybody is using local mode where Driver + Executor run in
>>>>> a single JVM in production mode.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are there any inherent issues upfront using local mode for production
>>>>> base systems.?..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to