Oh sorry, you're right. Implicit conversion doesn't affect the schema inference process.

Just checked that Joda is already a direct dependency of Spark. So I think it's probably fine to add support for recognizing Joda DateTime as SQL TimestampType. Would you mind to file a JIRA ticket for it? PR is also welcomed!

Cheng

On 11/24/15 8:05 PM, Bryan wrote:

Cheng,

I am using Scala. I have an implicit conversion from Joda DateTime to timestamp. My tables are defined with Timestamp. However explicit conversation appears to be required. Do you have an example of implicit conversion for this case? Do you convert on insert or on RDD to DF conversion?

Regards,

Bryan Jeffrey

Sent from Outlook Mail


*From: *Cheng Lian
*Sent: *Tuesday, November 24, 2015 6:49 AM
*To: *Bryan;user
*Subject: *Re: DateTime Support - Hive Parquet

I see, then this is actually irrelevant to Parquet. I guess can support Joda DateTime in Spark SQL reflective schema inference to have this, provided that this is a frequent use case and Spark SQL already has Joda as a direct dependency.

On the other hand, if you are using Scala, you can write a simple implicit conversion method to avoid all the manual conversions.

Cheng

On 11/24/15 7:25 PM, Bryan wrote:

    Cheng,

    That’s exactly what I was hoping for – native support for writing
    DateTime objects. As it stands Spark 1.5.2 seems to leave no
    option but to do manual conversion (to nanos, Timestamp, etc)
    prior to writing records to hive.

    Regards,

    Bryan Jeffrey

    Sent from Outlook Mail


    *From: *Cheng Lian
    *Sent: *Tuesday, November 24, 2015 1:42 AM
    *To: *Bryan Jeffrey;user
    *Subject: *Re: DateTime Support - Hive Parquet

    Hey Bryan,

    What do you mean by "DateTime properties"? Hive and Spark SQL both

    support DATE and TIMESTAMP types, but there's no DATETIME type. So I

    assume you are referring to Java class DateTime (possibly the one in

    joda)? Could you please provide a sample snippet that illustrates
    your

    requirement?

    Cheng

    On 11/23/15 9:40 PM, Bryan Jeffrey wrote:

    > All,

    >

    > I am attempting to write objects that include a DateTime
    properties to

    > a persistent table using Spark 1.5.2 / HiveContext.  In 1.4.1 I was

    > forced to convert the DateTime properties to Timestamp
    properties.  I

    > was under the impression that this issue was fixed in the
    default Hive

    > supported with 1.5.2 - however, I am still seeing the associated
    errors.

    >

    > Is there a bug I can follow to determine when DateTime will be

    > supported for Parquet?

    >

    > Regards,

    >

    > Bryan Jeffrey


Reply via email to