Oh sorry, you're right. Implicit conversion doesn't affect the schema
inference process.
Just checked that Joda is already a direct dependency of Spark. So I
think it's probably fine to add support for recognizing Joda DateTime as
SQL TimestampType. Would you mind to file a JIRA ticket for it? PR is
also welcomed!
Cheng
On 11/24/15 8:05 PM, Bryan wrote:
Cheng,
I am using Scala. I have an implicit conversion from Joda DateTime to
timestamp. My tables are defined with Timestamp. However explicit
conversation appears to be required. Do you have an example of
implicit conversion for this case? Do you convert on insert or on RDD
to DF conversion?
Regards,
Bryan Jeffrey
Sent from Outlook Mail
*From: *Cheng Lian
*Sent: *Tuesday, November 24, 2015 6:49 AM
*To: *Bryan;user
*Subject: *Re: DateTime Support - Hive Parquet
I see, then this is actually irrelevant to Parquet. I guess can
support Joda DateTime in Spark SQL reflective schema inference to have
this, provided that this is a frequent use case and Spark SQL already
has Joda as a direct dependency.
On the other hand, if you are using Scala, you can write a simple
implicit conversion method to avoid all the manual conversions.
Cheng
On 11/24/15 7:25 PM, Bryan wrote:
Cheng,
That’s exactly what I was hoping for – native support for writing
DateTime objects. As it stands Spark 1.5.2 seems to leave no
option but to do manual conversion (to nanos, Timestamp, etc)
prior to writing records to hive.
Regards,
Bryan Jeffrey
Sent from Outlook Mail
*From: *Cheng Lian
*Sent: *Tuesday, November 24, 2015 1:42 AM
*To: *Bryan Jeffrey;user
*Subject: *Re: DateTime Support - Hive Parquet
Hey Bryan,
What do you mean by "DateTime properties"? Hive and Spark SQL both
support DATE and TIMESTAMP types, but there's no DATETIME type. So I
assume you are referring to Java class DateTime (possibly the one in
joda)? Could you please provide a sample snippet that illustrates
your
requirement?
Cheng
On 11/23/15 9:40 PM, Bryan Jeffrey wrote:
> All,
>
> I am attempting to write objects that include a DateTime
properties to
> a persistent table using Spark 1.5.2 / HiveContext. In 1.4.1 I was
> forced to convert the DateTime properties to Timestamp
properties. I
> was under the impression that this issue was fixed in the
default Hive
> supported with 1.5.2 - however, I am still seeing the associated
errors.
>
> Is there a bug I can follow to determine when DateTime will be
> supported for Parquet?
>
> Regards,
>
> Bryan Jeffrey