On Sep 2, 2015, at 11:31 PM, Davies Liu
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Could you have a short script to reproduce this?
Good point. Here you go. This is Python 3.4.3 on Ubuntu 15.04.
import pandas as pd # must be in default path for interpreter
import pyspark
LEN = 260
ITER_CT = 10000
conf = pyspark.SparkConf()
conf.set('spark.python.profile', 'true')
sc = pyspark.SparkContext(conf=conf)
a = sc.broadcast(pd.Series(range(LEN)))
def map_(i):
b = pd.Series(range(LEN))
for i in range(ITER_CT):
b.corr(a.value)
return None
shards = sc.parallelize(range(sc.defaultParallelism), sc.defaultParallelism)
data = shards.map(map_)
data.collect()
sc.show_profiles()
Run as:
$ spark-submit --master local[4] demo.py
Here’s a profile excerpt:
============================================================
Profile of RDD<id=1>
============================================================
7160748 function calls (7040732 primitive calls) in 7.075 seconds
Ordered by: internal time, cumulative time
ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function)
40000 0.551 0.000 1.908 0.000 function_base.py:1780(cov)
120000 0.527 0.000 0.527 0.000 {method 'reduce' of 'numpy.ufunc'
objects}
440020 0.493 0.000 0.493 0.000 {built-in method array}
[...]
80012 0.069 0.000 0.095 0.000 <frozen
importlib._bootstrap>:2264(_handle_fromlist)
The import-related stuff is not quite the same: different function, and the
total amount of time it’s using is less. However, the number of calls still
seems quite high (80,000, which is 10× the number of loop iterations).
Much appreciate your help. Let me know what other information would be useful.
Thanks,
Reid
