Honestly you are addressing this wrongly - you do not seem.to have a business case for changing - so why do you want to switch
Le sam. 11 juil. 2015 à 3:28, Mohammed Guller <moham...@glassbeam.com> a écrit : > Hi Ravi, > > First, Neither Spark nor Spark SQL is a database. Both are compute > engines, which need to be paired with a storage system. Seconds, they are > designed for processing large distributed datasets. If you have only > 100,000 records or even a million records, you don’t need Spark. A RDBMS > will perform much better for that volume of data. > > > > Mohammed > > > > *From:* Ravisankar Mani [mailto:rrav...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, July 10, 2015 3:50 AM > *To:* user@spark.apache.org > *Subject:* Spark performance > > > > Hi everyone, > > I have planned to move mssql server to spark?. I have using around 50,000 > to 1l records. > > The spark performance is slow when compared to mssql server. > > > > What is the best data base(Spark or sql) to store or retrieve data around > 50,000 to 1l records ? > > regards, > > Ravi > > >
