Looking at output from dependency:tree, servlet-api is brought in by the following:
[INFO] +- org.apache.cassandra:cassandra-all:jar:1.2.6:compile [INFO] | +- org.antlr:antlr:jar:3.2:compile [INFO] | +- com.googlecode.json-simple:json-simple:jar:1.1:compile [INFO] | +- org.yaml:snakeyaml:jar:1.6:compile [INFO] | +- edu.stanford.ppl:snaptree:jar:0.1:compile [INFO] | +- org.mindrot:jbcrypt:jar:0.3m:compile [INFO] | +- org.apache.thrift:libthrift:jar:0.7.0:compile [INFO] | | \- javax.servlet:servlet-api:jar:2.5:compile FYI On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Pala M Muthaia <mchett...@rocketfuelinc.com > wrote: > Hi, > > We are trying to build spark 1.2 from source (tip of the branch-1.2 at the > moment). I tried to build spark using the following command: > > mvn -U -Pyarn -Phadoop-2.4 -Dhadoop.version=2.4.0 -Phive > -Phive-thriftserver -DskipTests clean package > > I encountered various missing class definition exceptions (e.g: class > javax.servlet.ServletException not found). > > I eventually got the build to succeed after adding the following set of > dependencies to the spark-core's pom.xml: > > <dependency> > <groupId>javax.servlet</groupId> > <artifactId>*servlet-api*</artifactId> > <version>3.0</version> > </dependency> > > <dependency> > <groupId>org.eclipse.jetty</groupId> > <artifactId>*jetty-io*</artifactId> > </dependency> > > <dependency> > <groupId>org.eclipse.jetty</groupId> > <artifactId>*jetty-http*</artifactId> > </dependency> > > <dependency> > <groupId>org.eclipse.jetty</groupId> > <artifactId>*jetty-servlet*</artifactId> > </dependency> > > Pretty much all of the missing class definition errors came up while > building HttpServer.scala, and went away after the above dependencies were > included. > > My guess is official build for spark 1.2 is working already. My question > is what is wrong with my environment or setup, that requires me to add > dependencies to pom.xml in this manner, to get this build to succeed. > > Also, i am not sure if this build would work at runtime for us, i am still > testing this out. > > > Thanks, > pala >
