I am in agreement with Dmitriy. In addition, Hadoop itself has not gone 1.0 due to the lack of stable APIs. We should probably aim for 1.0 around the same time.
Santhosh -----Original Message----- From: Dmitriy Ryaboy [mailto:dvrya...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 6:31 PM To: user@pig.apache.org Cc: Olga Natkovich Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Pig.next I am worried that the new optimization plan work has not had a chance to settle in, and we are releasing a brand new parser for the language in 0.9. Those are pretty significant changes, if the idea behind calling something a "1.0" is stability, we may want to give them a release to mature a bit. Of course we can just release 0.9x for a while until we feel this stuff has been tested in a wide enough variety of installations / hadoop configurations / use cases. D On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > Pig Users and Developers, > > We are starting to plan the work after Pig 0.9. One thing we need to > decide is what name/number to give to the next release: Pig 0.10 or Pig 1.0. > > I believe that we are ready to declare 1.0. Here are my reasons: > > (1) We are mature enough and produce good quality releases > (2) Our interface no longer change in major ways > (3) We have a growing user community and we want the newcomers to know > that our releases are stable > (4) If the next release is 0.10 and we decide that we should switch on > the following release going from 0.10 to 1.0 will generate a lot of > confusion. > > I wanted to start this conversation and see what others think before > deciding if it is worth while to call a vote. > > Olga >
