Hoya isn't HBase or Phoenix. It's a separate project, now named Slider, now in incubation at Apache, see http://incubator.apache.org/projects/slider.html
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it> wrote: > So Hoya is a different thing from Hbase on hadoop 2? > > On Sep 25, 2014 11:23 PM, "Jesse Yates" <jesse.k.ya...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Mostly its the use of hadoop metrics2 that has to change, as they change >> the backing methods. If you are interested, take the hbase compatibility >> layer to see most of where HBase shims things. >> >> ------------------- >> Jesse Yates >> @jesse_yates >> jyates.github.com >> >> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it> >> wrote: >>> >>> Any help here? :( >>> >>> On Sep 24, 2014 8:29 AM, "Flavio Pompermaier" <pomperma...@okkam.it> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Just a curiosity..what is the difference between hbase on hadoop1 or >>>> hadoop2 from a functional point of view? >>>> Does HBase on hadoop2 (Hoya?) rely on YARN features? >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:15 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> We'll definitely remove hadoop1 support from 4.x, as it's causing pom >>>>> issues. We can't support both hadoop1 and hadoop2 and make hadoop2 the >>>>> default (see prior discussions - basically due to how other projects >>>>> poms are authored). >>>>> >>>>> Sounds like a few folks are still relying on hadoop1 for 3.x, so I >>>>> guess we can leave support there a while longer. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> James >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:54 AM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > At the very least we could make hadoop2 the default target in 4.x. >>>>> > Seems fair to remove all the cruft from the 4 branch, too. >>>>> > >>>>> > There's still a fair amount of usage of HBase 0.94 on top of Hadoop >>>>> > 1. >>>>> > So maybe keep it alive in 3.0? 3.0 can be retired when HBase 0.94 is >>>>> > retired (although I have no plans for 0.94 retirement, yet). >>>>> > >>>>> > -- Lars >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> > From: James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> >>>>> > To: "d...@phoenix.apache.org" <d...@phoenix.apache.org>; user >>>>> > <user@phoenix.apache.org> >>>>> > Cc: >>>>> > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 10:19 PM >>>>> > Subject: anyone relying on hadoop1 still? >>>>> > >>>>> > Hello, >>>>> > We've been planning on dropping hadoop1 support for our 4.x releases >>>>> > for a while now and it looks like it'll happen in 4.2. It'd be nice >>>>> > if >>>>> > we could do the same for our 3.x releases, as the more similar the >>>>> > two >>>>> > branches are, the less time it takes to keep them in sync. >>>>> > >>>>> > Is anyone out there still relying on hadoop1 support for future 3.x >>>>> > releases? >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks, >>>>> > James >>>>> > >>>> >>>> >> > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
