On the HBase side, Phoenix seems to be working okay in that no errors are reported and Cloudera Manager can see all the existing tables. But the corresponding Phoenix client JAR does not connect. The stack trace clients receive is reminiscent of what I have seen in the past when there is an HBase version mismatch. Thank you for any suggestions.
An error occurred while establishing the connection: Long Message: Not a host:port pair: PBUF # blvdevhdp03.ds-iq.corp Details: Type: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException Stack Trace: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Not a host:port pair: PBUF blvdevhdp03.ds-iq.corp at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Addressing.parseHostname(Addressing.java:60) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ServerName.<init>(ServerName.java:101) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ServerName.parseVersionedServerName(ServerName.java:283) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.MasterAddressTracker.bytesToServerName(MasterAddressTracker.java:77) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.MasterAddressTracker.getMasterAddress(MasterAddressTracker.java:61) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HConnectionManager$HConnectionImplementation.getMaster(HConnectionManager.java:805) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HBaseAdmin.<init>(HBaseAdmin.java:127) at org.apache.phoenix.query.ConnectionQueryServicesImpl.ensureTableCreated(ConnectionQueryServicesImpl.java:725) at org.apache.phoenix.query.ConnectionQueryServicesImpl.createTable(ConnectionQueryServicesImpl.java:1007) at org.apache.phoenix.schema.MetaDataClient.createTableInternal(MetaDataClient.java:1156) at org.apache.phoenix.schema.MetaDataClient.createTable(MetaDataClient.java:422) at org.apache.phoenix.compile.CreateTableCompiler$2.execute(CreateTableCompiler.java:183) at org.apache.phoenix.jdbc.PhoenixStatement.executeMutation(PhoenixStatement.java:226) at org.apache.phoenix.jdbc.PhoenixStatement.executeUpdate(PhoenixStatement.java:908) at org.apache.phoenix.query.ConnectionQueryServicesImpl.init(ConnectionQueryServicesImpl.java:1316) at org.apache.phoenix.jdbc.PhoenixDriver.getConnectionQueryServices(PhoenixDriver.java:122) at org.apache.phoenix.jdbc.PhoenixEmbeddedDriver.connect(PhoenixEmbeddedDriver.java:112) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source) at com.onseven.dbvis.g.B.D.ā(Z:1413) at com.onseven.dbvis.g.B.F$A.call(Z:1474) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Unknown Source) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown Source) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) -----Original Message----- From: James Taylor [mailto:jamestay...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 11:35 AM To: user Subject: Re: CDH 5.1 Looks like you may be the first, Mike. If you try it, would you mind reporting back how it works? Thanks, James On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Alex Kamil <alex.ka...@gmail.com> wrote: > Mike, I'm on cdh4, but generally the extra steps are rebuilding > phoenix with hadoop and hbase jars from cdh, I posted steps here a > while back, feel free to update: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1041 > > Alex > > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Mike Friedman > <mike.fried...@ds-iq.com> > wrote: >> >> Has anyone gotten Phoenix to work on CDH5.1? I know theoretically >> because >> CDH5.1 includes HBase 0.98, Phoenix should just work but my >> experience is that that is not the case. It could be just some small >> additional step to get it going. Any suggestions appreciated. >> >> >> Mike >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mike Friedman [mailto:mike.fried...@ds-iq.com] >> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2014 7:35 AM >> To: <user@phoenix.apache.org> >> Subject: CDH 5.1 >> >> So now the eagerly awaited CDH 5.1 is out, the distribution that >> contains HBase 0.98. I am wondering if anyone here has upgraded to >> it, and has Phoenix core+client working on it. I know Phoenix has >> been tested with HBase >> 0.98 per se, but in the full context of CDH 5.1 do people have >> Phoenix running? Were there any special additional configuration >> steps you had to do? >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> Mike > >
