https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2459

please do not use backup/restore for now
just re-use previous DB

On Sun, 27 Sep 2020 at 07:24, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> wrote:

> these can be ignored
>
> others:
> [39mDEBUG [0;39m 09-26 10:30:39.827 [36mo.a.o.b.BackupExport:407 [main]
> [0;39m - Exception While writing node of type: class
> org.apache.openmeetings.db.entity.file.FileItem
> javax.xml.bind.MarshalException: null
>
> at
> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.MarshallerImpl.write(MarshallerImpl.java:301)
> at
> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.MarshallerImpl.marshal(MarshallerImpl.java:226)
> at
> javax.xml.bind.helpers.AbstractMarshallerImpl.marshal(AbstractMarshallerImpl.java:101)
> at
> org.apache.openmeetings.backup.BackupExport.writeList(BackupExport.java:404)
> at
> org.apache.openmeetings.backup.BackupExport.stream(BackupExport.java:374)
> at
> org.apache.openmeetings.backup.BackupExport.writeList(BackupExport.java:381)
> at
> org.apache.openmeetings.backup.BackupExport.exportFile(BackupExport.java:337)
> at
> org.apache.openmeetings.backup.BackupExport.performExport(BackupExport.java:188)
> at org.apache.openmeetings.cli.Admin.processBackup(Admin.java:365)
> at org.apache.openmeetings.cli.Admin.process(Admin.java:263)
> at org.apache.openmeetings.cli.Admin.main(Admin.java:563)
>
> Caused by: com.sun.istack.SAXException2:
> com.sun.xml.bind.api.AccessorException: The property has a setter "public
> void org.apache.openmeetings.db.entity.file.FileItem.setId(java.lang.Long)"
> but no getter. For marshaller, please define getters.
>
> at
> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.XMLSerializer.reportError(XMLSerializer.java:217)
> at
> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.XMLSerializer.reportError(XMLSerializer.java:232)
> at
> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.ClassBeanInfoImpl.serializeBody(ClassBeanInfoImpl.java:340)
> at
> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.XMLSerializer.childAsSoleContent(XMLSerializer.java:563)
> at
> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.ClassBeanInfoImpl.serializeRoot(ClassBeanInfoImpl.java:311)
> at
> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.XMLSerializer.childAsRoot(XMLSerializer.java:464)
> at
> com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.MarshallerImpl.write(MarshallerImpl.java:298)
> ... 10 common frames omitted
>
>
> can't be ignored
> I'm going to investigate it ASAP
> this might be blocker
>
>
> On Sat, 26 Sep 2020 at 17:39, Ali Alhaidary <ali.alhaid...@the5stars.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Trying to do back up by command line OM 5.0.1 old snapshot, I got on
>> screen these lines and attached a file for the output
>>
>> Sep 26, 2020 10:30:34 AM
>> com.hazelcast.internal.config.AbstractConfigLocator
>> INFO: Loading 'hazelcast.xml' from the classpath.
>> Sep 26, 2020 10:30:34 AM
>> com.hazelcast.instance.impl.HazelcastInstanceFactory
>> WARNING: Hazelcast is starting in a Java modular environment (Java 9 and
>> newer) but without proper access to required Java packages. Use
>> additional Java arguments to provide Hazelcast access to Java internal
>> API. The internal API access is used to get the best performance
>> results. Arguments to be used:
>>   --add-modules java.se --add-exports
>> java.base/jdk.internal.ref=ALL-UNNAMED --add-opens
>> java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED --add-opens
>> java.base/java.nio=ALL-UNNAMED --add-opens
>> java.base/sun.nio.ch=ALL-UNNAMED --add-opens
>> java.management/sun.management=ALL-UNNAMED --add-opens
>> jdk.management/com.sun.management.internal=ALL-UNNAMED
>> WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred
>> WARNING: Illegal reflective access by
>> com.hazelcast.internal.networking.nio.SelectorOptimizer
>> (file:/opt/open500/webapps/openmeetings/WEB-INF/lib/hazelcast-4.0.2.jar)
>> to field sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.selectedKeys
>> WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of
>> com.hazelcast.internal.networking.nio.SelectorOptimizer
>> WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal
>> reflective access operations
>> WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release
>>
>> My question is: should I just ignore them and move on ?
>>
>>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Maxim
>


-- 
Best regards,
Maxim

Reply via email to