I'm not good enough with graphical editor, this is why I'm asking for icon :))) I can implement new toolbar with all graphical tools available by click on this new icon And we can collect some feedback (hopefully)
According to new menu group Maybe it worth to create new menu item (under new group) like "Get feedback" Then voting can be performed by clicking on new "semitransparent overlay" This same "semitransparent overlay" will display results and contains control to stop quick-vote (available to moderators only) This way regular user and moderators can vote Only moderator can start/stop quick vote WDYT? On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote: > Hi Maxim, > > 1. There was one thread where was asked for a reduced/minimized toolbar. > So I made this mock-up. I just used the Picture right now. But it doesn't > need to be like that. > 2. Yes asked by voice > 3. Polls are just fine in the place where they are now. These Polls (my > understanding) are something that a teacher prepare *BEFORE* the session > start as a part of the the given class. And there need to be more than > yes/no and probably it is important to save this results . > > I want to address a different use case. Presentation is one is talking, > (many) other listen. Sometimes you need to get some feedback, not planed, > it is just to know "everybody alive?", "can we go on?", "yes or no?"... > Such things just during the presentation. And this should be a single click > operation. All other things what is in the given case "thumb up" and "thumb > down" need to communicate by voice before start the "vote". And therefore > it doesn't need to be saved or reproducible. It just makes sense in the > given context. So it can disappear after a short time. > > I also thought about a different way to implement this. Teacher still need > the button to start/stop the vote. But when started a semitransparent > overlay appear at students whiteboard (eg left blue right pink). They can > use their pointer to click on it. After finishing the vote the result will > be visible for 3-5 seconds and session goes on. > > And if it is easier result can also be shown in a&a (votes:42 / blue:42% / > pink:58%) without any graphical gimmick (but would be nice... ;-) ) > > Greetings Peter > > > Am 28.12.2017 um 17:21 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > > Let it be the thread regarding changes to the polls :))) > > So i guess the main issue: "long path" to vote > > Here are my questions: > 1) on your screenshots you don't have drawing tools and cliparts, but have > some "palette" icon ... maybe you can share it and what is hidden? > * this seems to make path to drawing longer ... is this OK > 2) it is not clear how such vote will be started .... or the question is > asked by voice? > 3) Maybe polls can be moved to the top level room menu group? would it > make them easier to use? > > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote: > >> 4.0.3 would be early enough... ;-) >> >> I know that you are the only one that develop the things... unfortunately >> my programming skills are not that good... :-( >> >> I know that it is in fact a simple yes/no poll... and you really can take >> it as a wish/feature request... I would like to get feedback. All the >> things I mention come because of feedback from teachers. All the little >> things are the difference between "I like to use this program" and "I have >> to use this program" ... ;-) >> >> The main difference to poll is that it is a two click operation for the >> teacher (start and stop -> left mouse on button in wb menu or hotkey?) and >> for student it is a one click operation (thumb up ore down in wb menu >> usable as long as the teacher has the poll open or hotkey?). The result >> disappears right (3 seconds?) after 2nd click of the teacher. >> >> Greetings Peter >> >> >> >> Am 28.12.2017 um 11:52 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: >> >> I guess I understand your plan .... >> You would like to have all issues fixed in 4.0.2 :)))) >> >> I propose to have "less, but better", i.e. check all wishes, put priority >> 1) I will not upgrade is "feature A" will not be implemented >> 2) "feature B" will make my life much easier >> 3) "feature C" is nice to have >> >> I don't have too much time, and this way I can better plan my work :)) >> >> I'll check this dot, I do remember it might be green/red and it should be >> yellow ... will double-check >> >> >> Right now poll will work very similar to your "quick poll" in case you >> have asked a question all room user will have pop-up dialog: WDYT? then >> poll can be archived/deleted .... >> IMHO the only difference is the way it is displayed ..... >> >> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote: >> >>> separate threads could help to keep the things present... How do we >>> prioritize it? >>> >>> I got one more thing in mind in the evening... >>> >>> 9. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-131 >>> >>> I need to have a look about room files... :-) and presenter role I found >>> now... I think they should mark different than normal user. Yellow dot >>> instead of green? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> The thing I suggest as quick poll is not really a pool it is more a >>> simplified student response system... It is just a tool to ask "WDYT?" and >>> is is important that it is a single click operation (for the teacher and >>> the student). No need to save it no need to let is visible longer than the >>> teacher is asking. And I think this will work perfectly beside poll. Poll >>> should be a tool that is more than a simple "WDYT?". I think these polls >>> should be prepared before the meeting and they are a pedagogical >>> instrument. Btw.. I think if there is time left we could have a look how to >>> improve current poll... ;-) >>> >>> Greetings Peter >>> >>> >>> Am 28.12.2017 um 09:45 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: >>> >>> Hello Peter, >>> >>> this seems to be huge list :) >>> Some of these items were implemented (like room files and presenter role) >>> some seems to be not very critical (like redo, and a&a place) >>> >>> According to quick poll: I would like to discuss it first, this seems to >>> be the same thing as current poll (on screen vote, instead of dialog), not >>> sure we need 2 instances of poll :)) >>> >>> Can we have separate threads for remaining issues? with some >>> prioritization? >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Peter Dähn <da...@vcrp.de> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I think there are a few little things left and maybe a few improvements >>>> should be discussed. I think we should use a new thread to do this. >>>> >>>> I think design of the room is almost finished with the latest chat >>>> improvements just the a&a field is left. >>>> >>>> I think a&a should share the space with the user list. A&a should have >>>> the same with than the user list. When hidden user list has max height if >>>> a&a is visible user list should have reduced height (scrollbar if needed). >>>> >>>> This is really the last thing that is missing in the design. >>>> >>>> >>>> I will fetch up now all ideas from former threads that should be >>>> discussed I think (no priority just how I find and remember them...). >>>> >>>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1791 >>>> >>>> 2. Redo Button for wb >>>> >>>> 3. >>>> >>>> Additionally we have number of >>>> issues:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1613https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-369https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-370https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-371https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-374 >>>> >>>> All this about introducing new room role: "Presenter" >>>> This role has less rights than Moderator, but more rights than "Draw >>>> on whiteboard" >>>> >>>> 4. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1671 (I still >>>> need to test room files for this and there was an Idea for scheduled >>>> meetings to implement a kind of countdown (audio/video) till start time) >>>> >>>> 5. We have implemented an area where the video pods "dock" when the >>>> meeting starts, although they can be repositioned at any time by the >>>> participants. See attached screenshot. the docking area is above the >>>> whiteboards. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *[image: Inline image 1] *6. It would be great to implement an option, >>>> to put the video-pod of a given moderator (presenter? see 3.) to a fixed >>>> position on the whiteboard in a presentation room. This is the place where >>>> the video-pod of the moderator should be displayed. The moderator just >>>> leave this part in his presentation blank and is visible for the audience. >>>> I think for a normal presentation this should be the default case for the >>>> audience. Max whiteboard and chat and the rest is minimized or hidden. >>>> >>>> 7. user-list sorting by name and by latest actions >>>> >>>> 8. dynamic room layouts >>>> >>>> commented till now " >>>> >>>> I'm afraid functionality like this "Then the moderator has the ability >>>> to change the layout to his needs" >>>> requires sort of templating .... >>>> So CSS dynamically created by one user will be applied to others .... >>>> " >>>> >>>> >>>> That's all things I found in the discussions. If I missed something >>>> pleas add here. And lets start think about what is implementable and what >>>> is the priority for this. >>>> >>>> Greetings Peter >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> WBR >>> Maxim aka solomax >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> WBR >> Maxim aka solomax >> >> > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax > > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
