Hi, All.
For webinar I'm use room type: restricted (1-150 user) and interview.
I have two server in Moscow for OM.
In June we held 3 open free webinar , with the amount
15-25 people from different cities of Russia, Belarus and Ukraine.
In General everything is working fine .
You can give participants and audio and video, but the main thing that they had
configured hardware ,
to listen echo , noise , etc. many people don't like .
I want a special room design for webinars.
Need diagnostic tools server load .
( to calculate the maximum stable number of participants ).
I'm on a business trip to 20.07 , in my spare time teach students
opportunities OM .
---
С уважением, Алексей Терехов.
+7 926 076 15 20
Четверг, 2 июля 2015, 21:08 +05:30 от Susheel Jalali
<susheel.jal...@coscendcommunications.com>:
>Dear Maxim and Peter,
>
>We would be happy to contribute by coding some
parts for new types
of conference rooms, but for that we would need some guidance.
>In past we contributed by identifying bugs with
one-time
invitation (fixed in 3.0.5) and WSDL File not found error.
>As we grow, we may attract more investors, and
perhaps we can
sponsor some of these initiatives. --
>Regards,
>Susheel Jalali
>Coscend
Communications Solutions
>susheel.jal...@coscendcommunications.com
>Web site: www.CoscendCommunications.com
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>CONFIDENTIALITY
NOTICE: See 'Confidentiality Notice Regarding E-mail Messages
from Coscend Communications Solutions' posted at:
http://www.CoscendCommunications.com/Terms_and_Conditions.html
>
>Subject: Re: "webinar" room
>From: Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com>
>Date: 07/01/15 15:35
>To: user@openmeetings.apache.org
>Susheel,
>
>A good way to speed things up is to contribute. Not only will
it ease the burden of the other contributors (both without and
with privileges), but it will also help in growing the
community. The larger the community, the greater the adoption,
the sooner bugs and improvement will get into released products.
But all is interlinked. ;-)
>
>
>Best regards,
>Pierre Smits
>
>Subject: Re: "webinar" room
>From: Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
>Date: 07/01/15 15:05
>To: Openmeetings user-list <user@openmeetings.apache.org>
>you can "sponsor" it using our commercial support
>This is the only way you can speed up things :(((((
>
>On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Susheel Jalali <
>susheel.jal...@coscendcommunications.com > wrote:
>Dear Maxim,
>
>It will be really useful for our employees and partners as well.
>
>Is there anything we could provide to help you release this "Webinar
Room" feature in 3.0.7 ?
>
>--
>Regards,
>Susheel Jalali
>Coscend
Communications Solutions
>susheel.jal...@coscendcommunications.com
>Web site: www.CoscendCommunications.com
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>CONFIDENTIALITY
NOTICE: See 'Confidentiality Notice Regarding E-mail Messages
from Coscend Communications Solutions' posted at:
http://www.CoscendCommunications.com/Terms_and_Conditions.html
>
>Subject: Re: "webinar" room
>From: df...@gmx.de
>Date: 06/30/15 23:26
>To: user@openmeetings.apache.org
>OK - I see the build-on-demand....
I know of course *everything* is important.
For me openmeetings now is a "nice toy" and it works stable and good
but I cannot use it for my purposes because I have only scenario:
- one or two "teachers" share video and audio to a big audience
- the audience can share their audio if they have questions, remarks and so on
- teacher and the others recognize this and can react
If teacher can manually give one or some people of the audience permission
to share their video, too this will be VERY VERY useful - but not absolutely
neccessary for using openmeetings (for me).
I have checked out alternatives but I want to wait and use OM because its
philosophy and software realization is the way I like it
Many thanks
Andreas
Am Dienstag, 30. Juni 2015, 23:22:34 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
>>This mean that will try to address this in the next minor release but not
100% sure
You can get builds here
>>https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/OpenMeetings/job/Openmeetings%203.0.x/
it is not nightly, but on-demand
>
>user_12137.eml
>Subject: Re: "webinar" room
>From: Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
>Date: 06/30/15 23:29
>To: Openmeetings user-list <user@openmeetings.apache.org>
>I can set to be build on nightly basis, but currently
see no need for this, if any user asks for the build I can push
the button, otherwise we build it for internal testing :)
>
>We will try to address this issue, the delay was caused by
our 3.1.0 branch, we were planned to speed up 3.1.0 development,
but unfortunately it is not the case :(
>
>
>On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:56 PM, < df...@gmx.de > wrote:
>OK - I see the build-on-demand....
>
>I know of course *everything* is important.
>
>For me openmeetings now is a "nice toy" and it works stable and good
>but I cannot use it for my purposes because I have only scenario:
>
>- one or two "teachers" share video and audio to a big audience
>- the audience can share their audio if they have questions, remarks
and so on
>- teacher and the others recognize this and can react
>
>If teacher can manually give one or some people of the audience
permission
>to share their video, too this will be VERY VERY useful - but not
absolutely
>neccessary for using openmeetings (for me).
>
>I have checked out alternatives but I want to wait and use OM
because its
>philosophy and software realization is the way I like it :)
>
>Many thanks
>Andreas
>
