Sure The only difference, I guess, LDAP users should have no "Login" permission, so these users need to be authenticated against LDAP only by default.
OFFTOPIC current LDAP code is very messy :( we have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-964 to reimplement it On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:46 AM, BBS Technik <dormiti...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi Maxim, > > would your new concept influence the ldap login, or better, could ldap be > a part of the new permission concept? > Ldap is a needed authentication method for me and I think for a lot of > productiv om servers. > > Best regards > > Ed > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 01. Juni 2014 um 06:15 Uhr > Von: "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com> > An: dev <d...@openmeetings.apache.org>, "Openmeetings user-list" < > user@openmeetings.apache.org> > Betreff: [DISCUSSION] ACLs in Openmeetings > > Hello All, > > Due to multiple requests and issues (please see [1], [2], [3]) I would > like to change User object (remove status and "user level") and add > Permissions. > > As I can see the permissions should be > Admin == access to Admin module > Room == enter the room > Dashboard == access the whiteboard > Login == login to Om internal DB > Soap == use rest/soap calls > > for example > current "regular" user will have all permissions except for Admin and Soap > current "soap" user will have soap permission only > current OAuth user will have no Login parmission > > The proposed system looks extendable and should cover all current needs > > I'm going to implement it in 3.0.3 and 3.1.0 > > Please let me know if you have any concerns/corrections > > Thanks in advance > > [1] http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/43ouivw7ysq6jorq > [2] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1007[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1007] > [3] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-986[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-986] > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
